Question · asked by 1 review
Hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy: First‐attempt success rate
- Population
- adults undergoing tracheal intubation
- Intervention
- Hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy
- Comparison
- direct laryngoscopy
- Outcome
- First‐attempt success rate
Hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy showed no clear difference in successful first attempt compared with direct laryngoscopy (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy Successful first attempt · adults undergoing tracheal intubation Hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy showed no clear difference in successful first attempt compared with direct laryngoscopy (low certainty). Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.03 [1, 1.05] | 66 studies · 8086 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.