Question · asked by 1 review
Early warning systems (EWS) and rapid response systems (RRS) vs usual care: Adverse events (unexpected cardiac or respiratory arrest) – non‐randomised studies (
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Early warning systems (EWS) and rapid response systems (RRS) vs usual care Adverse events (unexpected cardiac or respiratory arrest) – randomised trials ( · adult on acute hospital wards at risk of clinical deterioration Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | AOR 0.94 [0.79, 1.13] | 364094 participants | Low |
Early warning systems (EWS) and rapid response systems (RRS) vs usual care Adverse events (unexpected cardiac or respiratory arrest) – non‐randomised studies ( · adult on acute hospital wards at risk of clinical deterioration Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.