Question · asked by 1 review

Fluoride toothpaste vs Placebo (non-fluoride) toothpaste or fluoride toothpaste of a different concentration: Adverse effects of toothpaste

Population
Children and adolescents with immature permanent dentition (aged 5 to 16 years at study start)
Intervention
Fluoride toothpaste
Comparison
Placebo (non-fluoride) toothpaste or fluoride toothpaste of a different concentration
Outcome
Adverse effects of toothpaste

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fluoride toothpaste (any concentration; pooled across comparisons) vs Lower-concentration or non-fluoride toothpaste (pooled across comparisons)
Adverse effects of toothpaste · Children and adolescents with immature permanent dentition (aged 5 to 16 years at study start) · Closest to 36 months
Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
16 studies assessed possible side effects, principally oral (soft tissue) pathologies and tooth staining. 6 studies reported no untoward events; 6 reported greater staining in the stannous fluoride group; 1 reported no…16 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries
2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
2018-08Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.