Question · asked by 1 review

Anti‐TNF discontinuation vs anti‐TNF continuation: Proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression

Anti‐TNF discontinuation leads to higher proportion participants with minimal radiographic progression compared with anti‐TNF continuation (high certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Anti‐TNF discontinuation vs anti‐TNF continuation
Proportion participants with minimal radiographic progression · people with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity using a standard dose of anti‐TNF agents
Anti‐TNF discontinuation leads to higher proportion participants with minimal radiographic progression compared with anti‐TNF continuation (high certainty).
Down‐titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor–blocking agents for rheumatoid… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.69 [1.1, 2.59]3 studies · 549 participantsHigh

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Down‐titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor–blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low…
2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.