Multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation vs usual care: Greater dependence in personal activities of daily livingg
It is very uncertain whether multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation changes greater dependence in personal activities of daily livingg compared with usual care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation vs usual care Greater dependence in personal activities of daily livingg · older people undergoing rehabilitation soon after surgically treated hip fracture It is very uncertain whether multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation changes greater dependence in personal activities of daily livingg compared with usual care (very low certainty). Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.87 [0.76, 0.99] | 4 studies · 754 participants | Very low |
Multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation vs usual care Greater dependence in personal activities of daily livingg · older people undergoing rehabilitation soon after surgically treated hip fracture It is very uncertain whether multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation changes greater dependence in personal activities of daily livingg compared with usual care (very low certainty). Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.64 [0.51, 0.81] | 2 studies · 238 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.