URS with stent placement vs URS with no stent placement: Narcotic requirement
It is very uncertain whether URS with stent placement changes narcotic requirement compared with URS with no stent placement (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
URS with stent placement vs URS with no stent placement Narcotic requirement It is very uncertain whether URS with stent placement changes narcotic requirement compared with URS with no stent placement (very low certainty). Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.8 [0.48, 1.36] | 7 studies · 830 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.