Question · asked by 1 review
Peer support plus standard care vs usual care: Global state: clinically important change in global state
- Population
- people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
- Intervention
- Peer support plus standard care
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Global state: clinically important change in global state
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Peer support plus standard care vs standard care Global state: clinically important change in global state · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness The review found no eligible studies for this question. Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Peer support plus standard care vs clinician‐led support plus standard care · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.