Question · asked by 1 review
Continuous glucose monitoring system vs self‐monitoring of glucose: Perinatal mortality
- Population
- women with gestational diabetes mellitus
- Intervention
- Continuous glucose monitoring system
- Comparison
- self‐monitoring of glucose
- Outcome
- Perinatal mortality
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Continuous glucose monitoring system vs self‐monitoring of glucose Perinatal mortality (stillbirth or neonatal death) · women with gestational diabetes mellitus Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 179 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Continuous glucose monitoring system vs intermittent glucose monitoring · women with pre‐existing diabetes · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.