Question · asked by 1 review

Clearfil Protect Bond antibacterial fluoride-releasing primer vs Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control: White spot lesion rate and volume

Population
Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond)
Intervention
Clearfil Protect Bond antibacterial fluoride-releasing primer
Comparison
Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control
Outcome
White spot lesion rate and volume

Clearfil Protect Bond showed no WSL-rate difference versus conventional adhesive, with certainty not graded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Clearfil Protect Bond vs Transbond XT conventional adhesive
White spot lesion rate and volume · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · 8 weeks after bonding, Fixed orthodontic treatment
Clearfil Protect Bond showed no WSL-rate difference versus conventional adhesive, with certainty not graded.
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024) All outcomes
There was no significant difference among the WSL rates of the Clearfil, Opal Seal, and Transbond XT adhesives (p > 0.05).1 study · 15 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.