Question · asked by 1 review
De‐escalation vs usual care: Agitated behaviour (observational measure) Measured by: Observation Scale (25 items scored after 3 minutes of observation by clinical raters; lower score = less severe behaviours)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
De‐escalation vs standard care Agitated behaviour (observational measure) Measured by: Observation Scale (25 items scored after 3 minutes of observation by clinical raters; lower score = less severe behaviours) · patients with dementia De‐escalation techniques for managing non‐psychosis induced aggression in adults (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 306 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| De‐escalation techniques for managing non‐psychosis induced aggression in adults 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.