Low‐GI dietary advice vs moderate‐ to high‐GI dietary advice (child outcomes): Caesarean section
It is very uncertain whether low‐GI dietary advice changes caesarean birth compared with moderate‐ to high‐GI dietary advice (maternal outcomes) (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Low‐GI dietary advice vs moderate‐ to high‐GI dietary advice (maternal outcomes) Caesarean birth · pregnant women It is very uncertain whether low‐GI dietary advice changes caesarean birth compared with moderate‐ to high‐GI dietary advice (maternal outcomes) (very low certainty). Dietary advice interventions in pregnancy for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.27 [0.79, 2.04] | 2 studies · 201 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dietary advice interventions in pregnancy for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.