Question · asked by 1 review
Chlorhexidine vs Miswak: Incidence of VAP
- Population
- Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU
- Intervention
- Chlorhexidine
- Comparison
- Miswak
- Outcome
- Incidence of VAP
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Chlorhexidine vs Miswak Incidence of VAP · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes | Chlorhexidine versus miswak (Irani 2019): no evidence of a difference in incidence of VAP; single study. Also no difference in number treated with systemic antibiotics. | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2020-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Chlorhexidine vs Nanosil (nanosilver) · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU · 1 review
- Chlorhexidine vs Potassium permanganate · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU · 1 review
- Chlorhexidine vs Hydrogen peroxide · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU · 1 review
- Chlorhexidine vs Ozonated water · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.