Question · asked by 1 review
Treatment informed by feedback of patient reported outcome measures vs treatment: Changes in the management of CMHDs Changes in drug therapy and referrals for specialist care
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Treatment informed by feedback of patient reported outcome measures vs treatment Changes in the management of CMHDs Changes in drug therapy and referrals for specialist care · People with common mental health disorders1 Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health… (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 1215 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.