Question · asked by 1 review
Tape measurement vs clinical palpation: Caesarean section
- Population
- Pregnant women with singleton fetuses who were of 20 weeks' gestation and above.
- Intervention
- Tape measurement
- Comparison
- clinical palpation
- Outcome
- Caesarean section
It is very uncertain whether tape measurement changes caesarean section compared with clinical palpation (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Tape measurement vs clinical palpation Caesarean section · Pregnant women with singleton fetuses who were of 20 weeks' gestation and above. It is very uncertain whether tape measurement changes caesarean section compared with clinical palpation (very low certainty). Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.72 [0.31, 1.67] | 1 study · 1639 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.