Question · asked by 1 review
Removal of short‐term indwelling urethral catheters in adults: clamping vs free drainage: Condition‐specific QoL or generic QoL measure
- Population
- adults with short‐term indwelling urethral catheters that need to be removed
- Intervention
- Removal of short‐term indwelling urethral catheters in adults: clamping
- Comparison
- free drainage
- Outcome
- Condition‐specific QoL or generic QoL measure
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Removal of short‐term indwelling urethral catheters in adults: clamping vs free drainage Condition‐specific QoL or generic QoL measure · adults with short‐term indwelling urethral catheters that need to be removed The review found no eligible studies for this question. Strategies for the removal of short‐term indwelling urethral catheters in adults (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategies for the removal of short‐term indwelling urethral catheters in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.