Question · asked by 1 review

Squeezable (modified) feeding bottle vs Rigid feeding bottle: Weight (kg)

Population
Infants up to 6 months (from term) born with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate (Pierre Robin sequence or other syndromes excluded)
Intervention
Squeezable (modified) feeding bottle
Comparison
Rigid feeding bottle
Outcome
Weight (kg)

Squeezable (modified) feeding bottle showed no clear difference in weight (kg) compared with rigid feeding bottle; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Squeezable (modified) feeding bottle vs Rigid feeding bottle
Weight (kg) · Infants up to 6 months (from term) born with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate (Pierre Robin sequence or… · >6 months
Squeezable (modified) feeding bottle showed no clear difference in weight (kg) compared with rigid feeding bottle; GRADE not reported.
Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and… (2011) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.15 [-0.53, 0.22]2 studies · 130 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate
2011 · Cochrane All outcomes
2010-10Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.