Question · asked by 1 review
Multiple vs double‐injection technique: Adverse effects lasting more than 24 hours3
- Population
- Adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
- Intervention
- Multiple
- Comparison
- double‐injection technique
- Outcome
- Adverse effects lasting more than 24 hours3
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Multiple vs double‐injection technique Adverse effects lasting more than 24 hours5 · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 510 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in adults undergoing surgery of… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Multiple vs single‐injection technique · Adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.