Question · asked by 1 review
Rubber dam vs Isolite system: Participant acceptance/satisfaction
- Population
- Dental patients undergoing direct or indirect restorative treatment (no age or gender restriction)
- Intervention
- Rubber dam
- Comparison
- Isolite system
- Outcome
- Participant acceptance/satisfaction
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Rubber dam isolation vs Isolite system Participant acceptance/satisfaction · Dental patients undergoing restorative treatment (no age or gender restriction) · Pit and fissure sealing (permanent molars) Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes | Rubber dam may be associated with significantly lower satisfaction than the Isolite system but evidence very uncertain, mainly worse comfort (31%, P=0.02) and less preference (26%, P=0.002) (Alhareky 2014). | 1 study · 42 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-01 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.