T‐cell antibody induction vs placebo or no intervention: Acute rejection
T‐cell antibody induction probably leads to lower acute rejection Number of participants who experienced at least 1… compared with placebo/no intervention (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
T‐cell antibody induction vs placebo/no intervention Acute rejection Number of participants who experienced at least 1 episode with acute rejection at latest · liver transplant recipients T‐cell antibody induction probably leads to lower acute rejection Number of participants who experienced at least 1… compared with placebo/no intervention (moderate certainty). Antibody induction versus placebo, no induction, or another type of antibody induction for liver transplant… (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.85 | 16 studies · 1918 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody induction versus placebo, no induction, or another type of antibody induction for liver transplant recipients 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.