Question · asked by 1 review
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy: Adverse drug reactions
- Population
- Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without reduction) whose symptoms and/or clinical signs had not improved after conservative therapy
- Intervention
- Arthrocentesis and lavage
- Comparison
- Arthroscopy
- Outcome
- Adverse drug reactions
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy Adverse reactions · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without… · 1 year Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes | Only Goudot 2000 reported adverse reactions. Arthroscopy group: one transient frontal palsy (during 3 months); one cervico-facial oedema requiring prolonged intubation (12 hours). Arthrocentesis group: two severe… | 1 study · 62 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-08 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.