Question · asked by 1 review
AFI vs SDVP: summary of findings table: Admission to neonatal intensive care unit
- Population
- pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcome
- Intervention
- AFI
- Comparison
- SDVP: summary of findings table
- Outcome
- Admission to neonatal intensive care unit
AFI showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal intensive care unit compared with SDVP: summary of findings table (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
AFI vs SDVP: summary of findings table Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcome AFI showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal intensive care unit compared with SDVP: summary of findings table (moderate certainty). Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse… (2008) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.04 [0.85, 1.26] | 5 studies · 3226 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome 2008 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.