Peer support plus standard care vs usual care: Adverse events: all cause – long term
It is very uncertain whether peer support plus standard care changes adverse events: all cause – long term compared with standard care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Peer support plus standard care vs standard care Adverse events: all cause – long term · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness It is very uncertain whether peer support plus standard care changes adverse events: all cause – long term compared with standard care (very low certainty). Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.52 [0.43, 5.31] | 1 study · 555 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.