Silver alloyed catheter vs silicone catheter: with turbid urine Questionnaire
Silver alloyed catheter showed no clear difference in with turbid urine Questionnaire compared with silicone catheter (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Silver alloyed catheter vs silicone catheter with turbid urine Questionnaire · patients with long‐term bladder drainage in adults Silver alloyed catheter showed no clear difference in with turbid urine Questionnaire compared with silicone catheter (low certainty). Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long‐term bladder drainage in adults (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.25 [0.03, 1.86] | 1 study · 20 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long‐term bladder drainage in adults 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.