Question · asked by 1 review

Restriction of pacifier use vs no restriction: Proportion of infants exclusively breastfed at 4‐6 months

Restriction of pacifier use showed no clear difference in proportion of infants exclusively breastfed at 4‐6 months compared with no restriction (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Restriction of pacifier use vs no restriction
Proportion of infants exclusively breastfed at 4‐6 months · healthy full‐term newborns whose mothers have initiated breastfeeding and intend to exclusively breastfeed
Restriction of pacifier use showed no clear difference in proportion of infants exclusively breastfed at 4‐6 months compared with no restriction (moderate certainty).
Effect of restricted pacifier use in breastfeeding term infants for increasing duration of breastfeeding (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.01 [0.94, 1.09]1 study · 970 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Effect of restricted pacifier use in breastfeeding term infants for increasing duration of breastfeeding
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.