Question · asked by 1 review
Primary (complete) wound closure vs Secondary (partial) wound closure: Temporary altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation
- Population
- Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal
- Intervention
- Primary (complete) wound closure
- Comparison
- Secondary (partial) wound closure
- Outcome
- Temporary altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary (complete) wound closure vs Secondary (partial) wound closure Temporary altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation · Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal · ~1 month The review found no eligible studies for this question. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-07 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.