Question · asked by 1 review
Antioxidants vs no intervention: Serious adverse events (proportion)
- Population
- people with non‐alcohol‐related fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
- Intervention
- Antioxidants
- Comparison
- no intervention
- Outcome
- Serious adverse events (proportion)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Antioxidants vs no intervention Serious adverse events (proportion) · participants with non‐alcohol related fatty liver disease (NAFLD) Pharmacological interventions for non‐alcohol related fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 87 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacological interventions for non‐alcohol related fatty liver disease (NAFLD) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Antioxidants vs no intervention · alcohol‐related disorders (others) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.