Specific psychological therapy vs alternative specific psychological therapy: Clinical improvement: weight restoration to within the normal weight range for participant sample
It is very uncertain whether specific psychological therapy changes clinical improvement: weight restoration to within the normal weight… compared with alternative specific psychological therapy (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Specific psychological therapy vs alternative specific psychological therapy Clinical improvement: weight restoration to within the normal weight range for participant sample · people with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa It is very uncertain whether specific psychological therapy changes clinical improvement: weight restoration to within the normal weight… compared with alternative specific psychological therapy (very low certainty). Specific psychological therapies versus other therapies or no treatment for severe and enduring anorexia… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.42 [0.66, 3.05] | 1 study · 63 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific psychological therapies versus other therapies or no treatment for severe and enduring anorexia nervosa 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.