Question · asked by 1 review
Continuous outcomes automated vs non‐automated weaning: Intensive care unit length of stay (based on type of control arm): predominantly protocolized control strategy
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Continuous outcomes automated vs non‐automated weaning Intensive care unit length of stay (based on type of control arm): predominantly protocolized control strategy · patients with weaning time in invasively ventilated critically ill adults Automated weaning and SBT systems versus non‐automated weaning strategies for weaning time in invasively… (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 337 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automated weaning and SBT systems versus non‐automated weaning strategies for weaning time in invasively ventilated critically ill adults 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.