Summary of findings table ‐ Bladder training vs no treatment: Participant‐reported cure or improvement: immediately after treatment
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Bladder training changes participant‐reported cure or improvement: immediately after treatment compared with no treatment (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Bladder training vs no treatment Participant‐reported cure or improvement: immediately after treatment · overactive bladder It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Bladder training changes participant‐reported cure or improvement: immediately after treatment compared with no treatment (very low certainty). Bladder training for treating overactive bladder in adults (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 17 [1.13, 256.56] | 1 study · 18 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bladder training for treating overactive bladder in adults 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.