Other pharmaceutical agents vs placebo or control: Visual acuity
Other pharmaceutical agents showed no clear difference in short‐term visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/60 at end of… compared with placebo or other control interventions (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Other pharmaceutical agents vs placebo or other control interventions Short‐term visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/60 at end of treatment; cycloplegics vs miotics · people with traumatic hyphema Other pharmaceutical agents showed no clear difference in short‐term visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/60 at end of… compared with placebo or other control interventions (low certainty). Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.82 [0.46, 1.45] | 1 study · 34 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.