Question · asked by 1 review

Routine scale and polish at a fixed interval vs No scheduled scale and polish treatment: Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness)

Population
Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental practice)
Intervention
Routine scale and polish at a fixed interval
Comparison
No scheduled scale and polish treatment
Outcome
Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness)

Planned, regular routine scale and polish (6-monthly; 12-monthly… may leads to higher participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness) compared with no scheduled scale and polish treatment (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Planned, regular routine scale and polish (6-monthly; 12-monthly parallel) vs No scheduled scale and polish treatment
Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness) · Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental… · 36 months, 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
Planned, regular routine scale and polish (6-monthly; 12-monthly… may leads to higher participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness) compared with no scheduled scale and polish treatment (low certainty).
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 1.83 [1.28, 2.63]1 study · 205 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults
2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
2018-01-10Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.