Question · asked by 1 review
Metal-free FDPs (zirconia ceramic) vs Metal-ceramic FDPs: Bridge failure
- Population
- Adults (18 years or older) needing a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP)
- Intervention
- Metal-free FDPs (zirconia ceramic)
- Comparison
- Metal-ceramic FDPs
- Outcome
- Bridge failure
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Metal-free FDPs (zirconia ceramic) vs Metal-ceramic FDPs Bridge failure · Adults (18 years or older) needing a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) · 12 and 36 months Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes | At 12 months and at 36 months 34 participants were available for analysis. No FDP failure was reported in either treatment approach at either time. | 1 study · 34 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-05 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.