Question · asked by 1 review

Prophylaxis (teeth cleaning) and CHX or iodine-NaF solution application in the dentition of women (mothers) vs placebo: Adverse events for mother or child

Population
For interventions, pregnant women and mothers of infants in the first year of life; for outcomes, children up to 6 years of age
Intervention
Prophylaxis (teeth cleaning) and CHX or iodine-NaF solution application in the dentition of women (mothers)
Comparison
placebo
Outcome
Adverse events for mother or child

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Prophylaxis (teeth cleaning) and CHX or iodine-NaF solution application in the dentition of women (mothers) vs Placebo
Adverse events for mother or child · For interventions, pregnant women and mothers of infants in the first year of life; for outcomes, children up to 6…
Interventions with pregnant women, new mothers and other primary caregivers for preventing early childhood… (2024) · Cochrane All outcomes
Two trials (Dasanayake 1993; Dasanayake 2002) reported adverse events related to topical application of the treatment solutions (other data).2 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions with pregnant women, new mothers and other primary caregivers for preventing early childhood caries
2024 · Cochrane All outcomes
2023-01Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.