Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings: anti‐pseudomonal antibiotics vs placebo: Survival: number of deaths

Population
adults and children with cystic fibrosis and a positive microbiological isolate of P aeruginosa from a respiratory tract specimen
Intervention
Summary of findings: anti‐pseudomonal antibiotics
Comparison
placebo
Outcome
Survival: number of deaths

Summary of findings: anti‐pseudomonal antibiotics showed no clear difference in survival: number of deaths compared with placebo (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings: anti‐pseudomonal antibiotics vs placebo
Survival: number of deaths · adults and children with CF and P aeruginosa
Summary of findings: anti‐pseudomonal antibiotics showed no clear difference in survival: number of deaths compared with placebo (low certainty).
Inhaled anti‐pseudomonal antibiotics for long‐term therapy in cystic fibrosis (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.17 [0.03, 1.09]2 studies · 767 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Inhaled anti‐pseudomonal antibiotics for long‐term therapy in cystic fibrosis
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.