Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive rehabilitation vs no treatment: Return to work
It is very uncertain whether cognitive rehabilitation changes return to work Assessed by attainment of work within 14 weeks… compared with no treatment (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive rehabilitation vs no treatment Return to work Assessed by attainment of work within 14 weeks (medium‐term) of initiating intervention · traumatic brain injury ‐ mild, moderate or severe It is very uncertain whether cognitive rehabilitation changes return to work Assessed by attainment of work within 14 weeks… compared with no treatment (very low certainty). Cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury to improve occupational outcomes (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.8 [0.74, 4.39] | 1 study · 50 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury to improve occupational outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.