Caries-active status vs Caries-free status: Prevalence (detection frequency) of S. mutans in saliva
S. mutans detection in saliva was higher in caries-active than caries-free individuals.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Caries-active status vs Caries-free status Prevalence (detection frequency) of S. mutans in saliva · Healthy caries-active and caries-free individuals · saliva, Saliva sample S. mutans detection in saliva was higher in caries-active than caries-free individuals. Streptococcus mutans and Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2025) All outcomes | OR 3.12 [2.02, 4.83] | 6 studies · 490 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Streptococcus mutans and Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2025 All outcomes | May 22, 2023 | 20 | Not applicable |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.