Planned early birth vs expectant management: Caesarean section
- Population
- pregnant women with hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks' gestation to term
- Intervention
- Planned early birth
- Comparison
- expectant management
- Outcome
- Caesarean section
Planned early delivery showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with expectant management (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Planned early delivery vs expectant management Caesarean section · pregnant women with hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks' gestation to term Planned early delivery showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with expectant management (moderate certainty). Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.91 [0.78, 1.07] | 4 studies · 1728 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Planned early birth vs expectant management · preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) · 1 review
- Planned early birth vs expectant management · pregnant women with a term suspected compromised baby · 1 review
- Planned early birth vs expectant management · women with prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks' gestation or later) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.