Question · asked by 1 review

Photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement vs Mechanical debridement alone: Probing pocket depth

Population
Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy (SPT)
Intervention
Photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement
Comparison
Mechanical debridement alone
Outcome
Probing pocket depth

It is very uncertain whether photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement changes probing pocket depth (mm) compared with mechanical debridement alone (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement vs Mechanical debridement alone
Probing pocket depth (mm) · Adults treated for periodontitis and receiving supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) · 12 months
It is very uncertain whether photodynamic therapy plus mechanical debridement changes probing pocket depth (mm) compared with mechanical debridement alone (very low certainty).
Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) for maintaining the dentition in adults treated for periodontitis (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.09 [-1.41, 1.23]1 study · 10 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) for maintaining the dentition in adults treated for periodontitis
2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-05Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.