Question · asked by 1 review
Acupressure vs sham control: Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity
- Population
- women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
- Intervention
- Acupressure
- Comparison
- sham control
- Outcome
- Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Acupressure vs sham control Serious neonatal morbidity or death ‐ not reported · women due for third trimester induction of labour The review found no eligible studies for this question. Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Acupressure vs usual care · women in the third trimester for induction of labour. · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.