Ruxolitinib vs placebo: Health‐related quality of life Patients that achieved a reduction of 50% or more in the total MF Symptom Assessment Form
Ruxolitinib may leads to higher health‐related quality of life Patients that achieved a reduction of… compared with placebo (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Ruxolitinib vs placebo Health‐related quality of life Patients that achieved a reduction of 50% or more in the total MF Symptom Assessment Form · Patients with treating MF Ruxolitinib may leads to higher health‐related quality of life Patients that achieved a reduction of… compared with placebo (low certainty). Janus kinase‐1 and Janus kinase‐2 inhibitors for treating myelofibrosis (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 8.82 [4.4, 17.69] | 1 study · 309 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Janus kinase‐1 and Janus kinase‐2 inhibitors for treating myelofibrosis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.