Question · asked by 1 review

Higher waist circumference vs Lower waist circumference: Dental caries in children

Population
Children (approx. 4-18 years)
Intervention
Higher waist circumference
Comparison
Lower waist circumference
Outcome
Dental caries in children

Waist circumference was not significantly associated with childhood dental caries (pooled OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.30; I2=47.7%); ungraded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Higher waist circumference vs Lower waist circumference
Dental caries in children · Children (approx. 4-18 years) · Dental examinations of children; 15 countries across Europe, Asia, the Americas and Oceania
Waist circumference was not significantly associated with childhood dental caries (pooled OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.30; I2=47.7%); ungraded.
Childhood obesity in relation to risk of dental caries: a cumulative and dose-response systematic review and… (2024) All outcomes
OR 1.08 [0.90, 1.30]2 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Childhood obesity in relation to risk of dental caries: a cumulative and dose-response systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
December 202324Not applicable

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.