Intensive discharge planning and case management vs prison only: Positive hair test for marijuana use
Intensive discharge planning and case management showed no clear difference in positive hair test for marijuana use compared with prison only (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intensive discharge planning and case management vs prison only Positive hair test for marijuana use · summary findings of female review Intensive discharge planning and case management showed no clear difference in positive hair test for marijuana use compared with prison only (moderate certainty). Interventions for female drug‐using offenders (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.75 [0.55, 1.03] | 1 study · 511 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for female drug‐using offenders 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.