Question · asked by 1 review
Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine vs calamine + cetirizine: Minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal of the treatment: Headache.
- Population
- pityriasis rosea
- Intervention
- Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine
- Comparison
- calamine + cetirizine
- Outcome
- Minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal of the treatment: Headache.
Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine showed no clear difference in minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal… compared with calamine + cetirizine (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine vs calamine + cetirizine Minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal of the treatment: Headache. · pityriasis rosea Acyclovir + calamine + cetirizine showed no clear difference in minor participant‐reported adverse events not requiring withdrawal… compared with calamine + cetirizine (low certainty). Interventions for pityriasis rosea (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 7 [0.4, 122.44] | 1 study · 24 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for pityriasis rosea 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.