Question · asked by 1 review
Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone) vs A different bone substitute: Complication at augmented site
- Population
- Patients undergoing two-stage maxillary sinus augmentation
- Intervention
- Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone)
- Comparison
- A different bone substitute
- Outcome
- Complication at augmented site
Bone substitute (anorganic bovine bone / Bio-Oss) showed no clear difference in complications at augmented site compared with A different bone substitute; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Bone substitute (anorganic bovine bone / Bio-Oss) vs A different bone substitute Complications at augmented site · Patients undergoing two-stage maxillary sinus augmentation · 1 year after loading Bone substitute (anorganic bovine bone / Bio-Oss) showed no clear difference in complications at augmented site compared with A different bone substitute; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes | OR 3.29 [0.12, 89.8] | 1 study · 11 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2014-01 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.