Question · asked by 1 review
Partograph vs no partograph (studies carried out: Caesarean section
- Population
- women in spontaneous labour at term
- Intervention
- Partograph
- Comparison
- no partograph (studies carried out
- Outcome
- Caesarean section
It is very uncertain whether partograph changes caesarean section (overall) compared with no partograph (studies carried out (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Partograph vs no partograph (studies carried out Caesarean section (overall) · women in spontaneous labour at term It is very uncertain whether partograph changes caesarean section (overall) compared with no partograph (studies carried out (very low certainty). Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.77 [0.4, 1.46] | 3 studies · 1813 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.