Question · asked by 1 review

Resorbable barrier (membrane) to seal the lateral window vs No membrane to seal the lateral window: Implant failure

Population
Patients undergoing lateral-window maxillary sinus lift
Intervention
Resorbable barrier (membrane) to seal the lateral window
Comparison
No membrane to seal the lateral window
Outcome
Implant failure

Resorbable barrier (membrane) to seal the lateral window showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with no membrane to seal the lateral window; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Resorbable barrier (membrane) to seal the lateral window vs No membrane to seal the lateral window
Implant failure · Patients undergoing lateral-window maxillary sinus lift · 1 year after loading
Resorbable barrier (membrane) to seal the lateral window showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with no membrane to seal the lateral window; GRADE not reported.
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes
OR 2.63 [0.75, 9.14]1 study · 104 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus
2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
2014-01Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.