Question · asked by 1 review
Standard rhGH vs no treatment: Number of pulmonary exacerbations or hospitalisations
- Population
- children and young adults with CF
- Intervention
- Standard rhGH
- Comparison
- no treatment
- Outcome
- Number of pulmonary exacerbations or hospitalisations
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Standard rhGH vs no treatment Number of pulmonary exacerbations or hospitalisations · children and young adults with CF Recombinant growth hormone therapy for cystic fibrosis in children and young adults (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 94 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recombinant growth hormone therapy for cystic fibrosis in children and young adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Standard rhGH vs placebo · children and young adults with CF · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.