Autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or usual care: Diabetic ulcers healed at 1 year.
Autologous platelet‐rich plasma may leads to higher chronic wounds (diabetic foot ulcers) completely healed compared with standard care with/without placebo (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs standard care with/without placebo Chronic wounds (diabetic foot ulcers) completely healed · adults with chronic wounds Autologous platelet‐rich plasma may leads to higher chronic wounds (diabetic foot ulcers) completely healed compared with standard care with/without placebo (low certainty). Autologous platelet‐rich plasma for treating chronic wounds (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.22 [1.01, 1.49] | 2 studies · 189 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autologous platelet‐rich plasma for treating chronic wounds 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.