BMT vs PBSCT: Relapse, progression or death (calculated instead of PFS)
BMT showed no clear difference in progress, relapse or death compared with PBSCT (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
BMT vs PBSCT Progress, relapse or death · participants with haematological malignancies BMT showed no clear difference in progress, relapse or death compared with PBSCT (moderate certainty). Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological… (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | HR 1.04 [0.89, 1.21] | 6 studies · 1225 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies in adults 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.