Question · asked by 1 review

Thalidomide (systemic; 100 mg or 300 mg daily) vs placebo: Number of (minor aphthous) oral ulcers

Population
People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically; primary care
Intervention
Thalidomide (systemic; 100 mg or 300 mg daily)
Comparison
placebo
Outcome
Number of (minor aphthous) oral ulcers

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Thalidomide (systemic; 100 mg or 300 mg daily) vs Placebo
Number of (minor aphthous) oral ulcers · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · Males only
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes
Hamuryudan 1998 (thalidomide 100 mg or 300 mg daily vs placebo, 101 male patients; high risk of reporting bias): a significant effect on mean numbers of minor oral ulcers was reported from week 4 in both thalidomide…1 study · 101 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease
2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
2013-10Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.